<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>my digitized life // john hwang &#187; Random</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johnhwang.net/category/random/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johnhwang.net</link>
	<description>a blog of sorts that is never consistently updated</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 10:22:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Amazing Georgia Tech Victory!</title>
		<link>http://www.johnhwang.net/200812/amazing-georgia-tech-victory/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johnhwang.net/200812/amazing-georgia-tech-victory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 04:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[georgia tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rivalry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnhwang.net/?p=470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tech was down 16 points at the half then the offense clicked into place.  What an absolutely amazing comeback victory by Georgia Tech against our rival!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">Tech was down 16 points at the half then the offense clicked into place.  What an absolutely amazing comeback victory by Georgia Tech against our rival!</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/pruMPBJGDOU&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;ap=%2526fmt%3D18"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/pruMPBJGDOU&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;ap=%2526fmt%3D18" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johnhwang.net/200812/amazing-georgia-tech-victory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What was the McCain camp thinking?</title>
		<link>http://www.johnhwang.net/200810/what-was-the-mccain-camp-thinking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johnhwang.net/200810/what-was-the-mccain-camp-thinking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 03:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joe biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john mccain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sarah palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnhwang.net/?p=452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When Sarah Palin was announced as John McCain&#8217;s running mate, I gave the McCain campaign the benefit of the doubt.  I thought to myself, hey- considering how many people work for and advise John McCain, surely Sarah must be highly qualified.  Even earlier this week, when I read news articles about Tina Fey&#8217;s ability to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarah_Palin" target="_blank">Sarah Palin</a> was announced as John McCain&#8217;s running mate, I gave the McCain campaign the benefit of the doubt.  I thought to myself, hey- considering how many people work for and advise John McCain, surely Sarah must be highly qualified.  Even earlier this week, when I read news articles about Tina Fey&#8217;s ability to portray Sarah Palin on Saturday Night Live, I thought the articles were ridiculing SNL&#8217;s ability to parody Sarah&#8217;s interviews.  To my horror, I have been completely wrong.  Go on <a href="http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Sarah+Palin&amp;search_type=&amp;aq=f" target="_blank">YouTube</a> and watch some of Sarah Palin&#8217;s actual interviews.  Keep in mind, they are not secondary sources and they are straight from the horse&#8217;s mouth.</p>
<p>I have to say that I&#8217;ve never felt so bad about a grown women before in my life but I feel so sorry for Sarah and her family.  I feel like she jumped into this without realizing how deep the muddy political well is and she only thought about the positives of being the Vice President of the United States and neglected everything else.  I feel sorry for her because she probably thinks that there is no way out now considering she is already in the spotlight and taking the backdoor out of the spotlight will make her look like a quitter.</p>
<p>On the other hand, after watching the debate between Joe and Sarah, I was surprised that she didn&#8217;t make any ridiculous mistakes and I applaud those that planned and coached her for this debate because they clearly had a plan.  Oddly enough, she basically stated her plan within the first few minutes of the debate; she said that she may not answer questions as the moderator or Joe would like her to answer.  She did exactly that.  Sarah rarely responded directly to the questions at hand and instead made the points that she wanted to make.  This is smart for two reasons.  First, it forces Joe to be on the defensive side of the fence because he wants to respond directly to her answer which may not be the same thing that the moderator had asked.  Second, due to the fact that she forming her responses regardless of the question asked most of the time, highlights of the debate to be played over and over again until next Tuesday&#8217;s second Presidential debate will portray her in a better light than this past week with her interview with Katie Couric.</p>
<p>So who do I think won the debate?  Well, let&#8217;s see&#8230; if there was a rubric of all questions asked as rows and two columns for Senator Biden and Governor Palin, I think I would have more <strong>relevant</strong> notes jotted down in the Biden column while I would have more questions marks on the Palin column.  If you cut out each candidates replies and replayed them randomly without the moderator&#8217;s question, I think both did a good job of getting the point across that their Presidential candidate would have liked them to get across but I still would give Biden the edge.</p>
<p>In the end, why even bother reading this?  I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s on YouTube by now so go watch it and make your own decision. <img src='http://www.johnhwang.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johnhwang.net/200810/what-was-the-mccain-camp-thinking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gas shortage in Charlotte.</title>
		<link>http://www.johnhwang.net/200809/gas-shortage-in-charlotte/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johnhwang.net/200809/gas-shortage-in-charlotte/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 04:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charlotte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gasoline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sarcasm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnhwang.net/?p=450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last time I checked, this is the year 2008.  It is quite amazing to me to think that in the year 2008, the City of Charlotte has had a shortage of gasoline for going on three weeks after Hurricane Ike has hit the Gulf Coast forcing the shutdown of significant percentage of refineries.  In the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last time I checked, this is the year 2008.  It is quite amazing to me to think that in the year 2008, the City of Charlotte has had a shortage of gasoline for going on three weeks after Hurricane Ike has hit the Gulf Coast forcing the shutdown of significant percentage of refineries.  In the year that oil companies like Exxon Mobile are <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/01/business/01cnd-exxon.html?em&amp;ex=1202101200&amp;en=575e77c5fd8688b0&amp;ei=5087%0A" target="_blank">announcing record profits</a> in consecutive quarters, you are telling me that it is taking these giant companies almost three weeks to be operating at 100% efficiency as prior to the hurricane?  That is quite unbelievable.</p>
<p>Allow me to continue my sarcastic tone; operating refineries in the hurricane prone Gulf Coast isn&#8217;t like finding the cure for cancer or finding the Holy Grail, is it?  A refinery that is shutdown due to a Hurricane isn&#8217;t a mysterious puzzle, it should be an expected technical problem that any decent company should be able to resolve with the only question being how many man hours it would take to get it done.  In stark contrast, it would be a completely different thing if the monster from <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1060277/" target="_blank">Cloverfield</a> popped up out of the Gulf of Mexico and destroyed all the refineries there.  That would be considered, say it with me those that are responsible for managing these refineries, un-ex-pect-ed because no one in there right mind would have ever imagined that scenario.</p>
<p>So my rant on refinery operators is done.  Of course, I&#8217;m not trying to shift the blame away from consumer panic caused by what seems to be a rumor but coming up on the third week of the gas shortage in Charlotte, I can&#8217;t help but think that there is some flaw in how the gasoline is distributed in the Southeast.</p>
<p>Less than two years away from 2010, where are the flying cars?  Better yet, where is <a href="http://bttf.wikia.com/wiki/Mr._Fusion" target="_blank">Mr. Fusion</a>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johnhwang.net/200809/gas-shortage-in-charlotte/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Georgia Tech beats BC, 19-16.</title>
		<link>http://www.johnhwang.net/200809/georgia-tech-beats-bc-19-16/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johnhwang.net/200809/georgia-tech-beats-bc-19-16/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 19:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[georgia tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[win]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnhwang.net/?p=438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, what a game!  The stories of the game were all about defense for both teams.  Tech&#8217;s defense was giving up yards left, right, and up the middle in the first half.  In the second half, it was a different story because they forced multiple turnovers and even got a safety.  The cream on the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, what a game!  The stories of the game were all about defense for both teams.  Tech&#8217;s defense was giving up yards left, right, and up the middle in the first half.  In the second half, it was a different story because they forced multiple turnovers and even got a safety.  The cream on the top was the athleticism of <a href="http://ramblinwreck.cstv.com/sports/m-footbl/mtt/nesbitt_josh00.html" target="_blank">Josh Nesbitt</a> making amazing plays&#8230; turning possible sacks on third downs into huge yard gains for the first.  I would have to say that Georgia Tech won because of our defense getting in gear and stopping Crane (was he hurt mid-3rd quarter?).</p>
<p>GT is now 2-0 and 1-0 in the ACC conference.  I realize that beating Jacksonville State and BC (in such an ugly way as Paul put it agreeably) doesn&#8217;t really match up to some of the ranked teams in the nation.  Yet still, considering that earlier this year and probably up until the final play clock ticked down in Chestnut Hill today, there were plenty of sketics questioning Tech&#8217;s chances of being successful; I think our offense did okay.</p>
<p>A win is a win regardless of how ugly of a win it was but obviously with three fumbles, two of which I attribute to the poor execution of the offense, we still have a long road of improvement ahead. <img src='http://www.johnhwang.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>GO TECH!  THWG!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johnhwang.net/200809/georgia-tech-beats-bc-19-16/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is a flexbone formation?</title>
		<link>http://www.johnhwang.net/200808/what-is-a-flexbone-formation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johnhwang.net/200808/what-is-a-flexbone-formation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 21:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flexbone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[georgia tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[offense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paul johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[triple-option]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnhwang.net/?p=430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the formations that Paul Johnson will run as triple-option is the flexbone formation.  I&#8217;ve created an image below depicting what a balanced flexbone formation looks like.  Keep a note of its distinct two A-backs (A) in slot and one B-back (B) in the backfield outlined in black and highlighted.  Of course, this is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the formations that Paul Johnson will run as triple-option is the <strong>flexbone formation</strong>.  I&#8217;ve created an image below depicting what a balanced flexbone formation looks like.  Keep a note of its distinct two A-backs (A) in slot and one B-back (B) in the backfield outlined in black and highlighted.  Of course, this is just one formation and there are many different ways to line up but you will almost always see one A-back in slot and a B-back with the last A-back being a blocker or receiver down the field.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-431 aligncenter" title="flexbone-format" src="http://www.johnhwang.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/flexbone-format.png" alt="" width="375" height="150" /></p>
<p>Again, one of the most unique things about the triple-option offense is that a play can be called without anyone knowing who is going to end up with the ball and where because there are several &#8216;options&#8217; the quarterback has when running the play from center.  It&#8217;s in no way foolproof but if executed properly, it&#8217;s a system that can chew up a lot of yards on the ground and give the offense the ability to control the clock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johnhwang.net/200808/what-is-a-flexbone-formation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Modest Win.</title>
		<link>http://www.johnhwang.net/200808/a-modest-win/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johnhwang.net/200808/a-modest-win/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 04:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnhwang.net/?p=427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My initial thought at the start of the second quarter was just&#8230; relief.  I was still a bit concerned about how our offensive players would operate in the new system but it looked like the guys made long strides since their fumble-filled Spring scrimmage.  I read in a separate AJC article when Fall practice was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My initial thought at the start of the second quarter was just&#8230; <strong>relief</strong>.  I was still a bit concerned about how our offensive players would operate in the new system but it looked like the guys made long strides since their fumble-filled <a href="http://www.ajc.com/search/content/sports/gatech/stories/2008/04/05/techfoot_0406.html" target="_blank">Spring scrimmage</a>.  I read in a separate <a href="http://www.ajc.com/search/content/sports/gatech/stories/2008/07/24/georgia_tech_running_back_dwyer.html" target="_blank">AJC article</a> when Fall practice was about to start that <a href="http://ramblinwreck.cstv.com/sports/m-footbl/mtt/nesbitt_josh00.html" target="_blank">Josh</a> and <a href="http://ramblinwreck.cstv.com/sports/m-footbl/mtt/dwyer_jonathan00.html" target="_blank">Jonathan</a> did a lot of work over the summer voluntarily to understand the new offense better; I guess that paid off a bit.  I was unable to watch the game because it was only broadcast as a streaming feed at ESPN360 only&#8230; unfortunately, ESPN didn&#8217;t get any from my ISP so I just got a nice &#8220;please tell your ISP that you want this service&#8221; message.  So I listened to the live radio broadcast from <a href="http://www.cstv.com" target="_blank">CSTV</a> instead.</p>
<p>First half was good, we had some good runs and decent passes so we gained a lot of yards.  Our defense was able to hold the Gamecocks to a few 3-and-outs by shutting down Perrilloux&#8217;s passing game.  Regardless, the second half was a different story.  Not exactly sure what happened during half-time, maybe the defense got a bit apathetic because we were leading by so much and relaxed&#8230; <strong>we gave away 258 yards</strong>.  That is a bit disappointing because once we start facing conference opponents, not only would you expect yardage multiplied but also points on the board.</p>
<p><strong>Five fumbles; two lost</strong>.  Those are pretty big numbers too.  Good thing about the fumbles (weird to say that) is that the fumbles were caused by tackles instead of offensive miscues.  It was good that we didn&#8217;t have any botched handoffs and pitches in the option.  In the end, I would consider this a modest win at best.  I am hoping that our team makes some more adjustments and improve on both sides of the ball starting from our next game at Boston College because I expect the margin of the score to normalize.</p>
<p>Considering that the core of our offense is so young (and seemingly eager to learn and improve), Georgia Tech is going to have a good season and even better future.  GO TECH!  TO HELL WITH GEORGIA!  <img src='http://www.johnhwang.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johnhwang.net/200808/a-modest-win/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quick update.</title>
		<link>http://www.johnhwang.net/200808/quick-update/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johnhwang.net/200808/quick-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 03:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baseball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[georgia tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[south korea]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnhwang.net/?p=424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a quick update on miscellaneous things since all I&#8217;ve been blogging about lately has only been relating to my fervor for Georgia Tech football. I want Canon to release the next full-frame digital SLR.  The 50D looks nice but I want a full-frame now. Oh&#8230; GT opening game day tomorrow&#8230; I am psyched!  GO [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a quick update on miscellaneous things since all I&#8217;ve been blogging about lately has only been relating to my fervor for Georgia Tech football.</p>
<ul>
<li>I want Canon to release the next <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&amp;hs=Axs&amp;q=5d+mark+ii+rumors&amp;btnG=Search" target="_blank">full-frame digital SLR</a>.  The <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&amp;hs=5xs&amp;q=canon+50d&amp;btnG=Search" target="_blank">50D</a> looks nice but I want a full-frame now.</li>
<li>Oh&#8230; GT opening game day tomorrow&#8230; I am psyched!  GO TECH!  STING &#8216;EM!</li>
<li>Is it just me or is our Economy going down the drain.  Everyone is all happy because gas is under $4.00 per gallon.</li>
<li>I wanted to vote for <a href="http://www.barackobama.com/" target="_blank">Barack</a> but the <a href="http://www.demconvention.com/" target="_blank">Democratic National Convention</a> is making me doubt.  Who&#8217;s manning Congress while all the democrats are working on speeches?</li>
<li>The <a href="http://en.beijing2008.cn/" target="_blank">2008 Olympics</a> were awesome.  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usain_Bolt" target="_blank">Usain</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Phelps" target="_blank">Michael</a> are inhuman.</li>
<li>Don&#8217;t care if the Chinese gymnasts were underage, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nastia_Liukin" target="_blank">Nastia</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shawn_Johnson" target="_blank">Shawn</a> still delivered against the wind.</li>
<li><a href="http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2008-08/24/content_9671469.htm" target="_blank">Chinese divers</a> have the ability to control water so it doesn&#8217;t splash.</li>
<li><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/olympics/baseball/7578103.stm" target="_blank">South Korea</a> is a baseball powerhouse.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johnhwang.net/200808/quick-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paul Johnson is a winner.</title>
		<link>http://www.johnhwang.net/200808/paul-johnson-is-a-winner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johnhwang.net/200808/paul-johnson-is-a-winner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 04:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[georgia tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paul johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yellow jackets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnhwang.net/?p=419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a follow up to this post, I wanted to post my thoughts on some of the reasons why I think hiring Paul Johnson was a great move for Georgia Tech. For the record, I am a Tech alumni and a HUGE Tech fan so I&#8217;ll state again that my post should be considered to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a follow up to <a href="http://www.johnhwang.net/200808/option-based-spread-offense/" target="_self">this</a> post, I wanted to post my thoughts on some of the reasons why I think hiring Paul Johnson was a great move for Georgia Tech. For the record, I am a Tech alumni and a <strong>HUGE</strong> Tech fan so I&#8217;ll state again that my post should be considered to be biased but hopefully well thought out and logical.  Lest we forget, there are plenty of naysayers out there that will digress and try to focus on &#8220;BCS vs. the option&#8221; but I would like to put the spotlight on &#8220;BCS vs. Paul Johnson&#8221; instead.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Instill Confidence</strong></span><br />
The future of Yellow Jackets football is bright.  Why?  It&#8217;s not because of the option-based offense that is often called &#8216;gimmicky&#8217; by American football followers.  It has more to do with the new Head Coach that is not installing this so-called gimmicky offense but because he is instilling new and pure confidence to his new football team.  Everyone whose ever asked Paul Johnson about his &#8220;system&#8221; or heard him talk about it understands how much rock-solid confidence he has in it that some would even go as far as calling it being stubborn.  I wouldn&#8217;t argue with that whatsoever but what I like reading and seeing is Paul making the players believe and build faith in something that they are not used to.  He&#8217;s like an powerful evangelist for the experience he gained over his college football career.  Confidence flows from the leader to the followers; from the head coach to the assistant coaches and players.  Paul Johnson exudes confidence and it will show in our football team.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Turn-around Winner</strong></span><br />
I even have caught myself questioning where this confidence comes from but a quick google to see Paul Johnson&#8217;s history in college football shows his <a href="http://www.cfbdatawarehouse.com/data/coaching/alltime_coach_year_by_year.php?coachid=2662" target="_blank">impressive résumé</a> of turning around programs and being a winner.  The thing that impresses me most is his ability to find ways to win with the tools he&#8217;s been given which so far has been limited at best.  There&#8217;s always been doors that prevented him from recruiting the best in the nation and that door has been kicked wide open.  Right now, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s the question of whether or not he will maintain his winning record because I have no doubt that he will at Tech.  The question is how far will he be able to surpass that by winning the games that matter: bowl games, championship games, and rivalry games.  With Paul&#8217;s track record, I have faith that as the Yellow Jackets matures, the fans will savor the answer to that question.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>MacGyver of Football</strong></span><br />
Paul Johnson is the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MacGyver#MacGyverisms" target="_blank">MacGyver</a> of American Football.  It&#8217;s funny to metaphorical say that but it&#8217;s true.  He takes whatever is available to him as a resource without taking anything for granted and maximizes the usefulness of everything to come out with wins.  PJ is always quoted as saying that he needs to learn what his team can do.  From what I can find, he uses that and molds his &#8220;system&#8221; so that it fits.  The Naval Academy lead the nation in rushing last year because that is what they were best at; he saw no point of putting balls up in the air and risk interceptions.  At Georgia Tech, he technically has better resources in the rushing and passing attack so I would be very surprised if we don&#8217;t see <a href="http://ramblinwreck.cstv.com/sports/m-footbl/mtt/booker_calvin00.html" target="_blank">Calvin</a> come out for snaps or see designated option-pass plays from <a href="http://ramblinwreck.cstv.com/sports/m-footbl/mtt/nesbitt_josh00.html" target="_blank">Josh</a> and <a href="http://ramblinwreck.cstv.com/sports/m-footbl/mtt/shaw_jaybo00.html" target="_blank">Jaybo</a>.  Naysayers, be aware of Paul Johnson&#8217;s MacGyver-ism. <img src='http://www.johnhwang.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>GO JACKETS!<br />
THWG!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johnhwang.net/200808/paul-johnson-is-a-winner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michael Phelps, why not more?</title>
		<link>http://www.johnhwang.net/200808/michael-phelps-why-not-more/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johnhwang.net/200808/michael-phelps-why-not-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 01:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beijing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael phelps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swimming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnhwang.net/?p=415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is absolutely amazing what Michael Phelps has done in Beijing over the past week. It&#8217;s a feat for someone to win a single gold medal at the Olympics; for one person to win eight is more&#8230; superhuman.  You don&#8217;t need an infrequent blogger like me to understate such an enormous feat but for the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is absolutely amazing what Michael Phelps has done in Beijing over the past week. It&#8217;s a feat for someone to win a single gold medal at the Olympics; for one person to win eight is more&#8230; superhuman.  You don&#8217;t need an infrequent blogger like me to understate such an enormous feat but for the sake of &#8220;what now?&#8221; and just simply out of curiosity, I have a serious question that I&#8217;m hoping someone could answer.</p>
<p>Why just eight events?  I counted sixteen men&#8217;s swimming events.  With such talent, I would think Michael could have won more medals.  I&#8217;m just saying&#8217;.  <img src='http://www.johnhwang.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johnhwang.net/200808/michael-phelps-why-not-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Option-based Spread Offense.</title>
		<link>http://www.johnhwang.net/200808/option-based-spread-offense/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johnhwang.net/200808/option-based-spread-offense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 02:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[georgia tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spread offense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[triple-option]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yellow jackets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnhwang.net/?p=410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We are merely weeks away from witnessing the new generation of Georgia Tech football.  New coaching staff, new offense, new quarterbacks, new running backs, new defense, new uniforms, and so many other &#8220;new&#8221; things&#8230; and I&#8217;ve been trying my best to keep up with everything that is new and developing since the end of our [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are merely weeks away from witnessing the new generation of Georgia Tech football.  New coaching staff, new offense, new quarterbacks, new running backs, new defense, new uniforms, and so many other &#8220;new&#8221; things&#8230; and I&#8217;ve been trying my best to keep up with everything that is new and developing since the end of our disappointing season last year.  Of course, the biggest change of all is the change that our new Head Coach, Paul Johnson, is bringing with him from his former tenure at the Naval Academy: the option-based spread offense.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>The Old Regime</strong></span><br />
Under former Head Coach Chan Gailey, Georgia Tech ran an offense predominantly known as the &#8220;pro-style&#8221; offense in College football.  This type of offense pivots on two types of plays, a passing play where the quarterback snaps the ball under center or in shotgun and throws it to a wide receiver or a running play where the quarterback hands off or pitches the ball to one of his backs.  The question that the defense needs to answer is&#8230; is the offense going to pass the ball or are they going to run the ball.  Chan ran this type of offense during his entire career at Tech and it was a decent offense but as we found out over the past five years, it was never consistent due to talent that wasn&#8217;t spread across the field on both sides of the ball.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>The New Regime</strong></span><br />
Paul Johnson, on the other hand, runs predominantly an option-based offense in flexbone formation that tries to spread the defense out across the field.  The core of such an offense is a strong dual-threat quarterback that has the ability to run the ball himself as a carrier and at the same time have the arm to throw the football.  The triple option is quite an elusive offense because no one really knows where the ball is going to end up, not even the offense, until the whistle is blown.</p>
<p>Snapped under center, the QB receives the ball and has to make multiple decisions based on how he reads the defense.  First option is to hand it off to the B-back who will run it up the middle.  If he sees the linebackers in the path, he will hold onto the ball and start rolling out to either his left or right and be flanked by an A-back.  If he sees that a defender is shadowing him, his second option is to lateral to the A-back right before the defender commits to tackle him in which case the A-back will have the ball to run the ball.  Otherwise, if the quarterback sees that a defender is shadowing his A-back, the third option is to keep the ball himself to run the ball.  Technically, there is also a fourth option which is for the QB to throw the ball to a receiver down the field but this is rather called the option-pass play rather than a triple-option because the wide receivers on a triple-option play are usually used as blockers instead of running routes.</p>
<p>The key to this offense is not brute strength or speed, it is <strong>execution</strong>.  Every time a play is called, every single person on the offense will have a job that they have to execute flawlessly because no one knows who the ball carrier will be or where the ball is going to go.  Paul Johnson has had a lot of success with this type of offense so far at his previous coaching positions at non-BCS schools.  So when Paul was hired, there were plenty of opinions by practically everyone that this type of offense will not work as effectively at the BCS level.  The primary argument seems to be that the defense is faster so that the elusiveness of the triple-option becomes null.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>My (maybe biased) Opinion</strong></span><br />
As a Tech fan (so I may be guilty of bias here), I think the criticism has been overdone.  No one knows what this offense is going to look like; Paul Johnson was quoted as saying that they ran the ball at Navy because it was what his team at the time was good and he was taking advantage of what he knew the team was capable of.  Yes, he likes and has absolute belief in his offensive scheme (a.k.a the &#8220;system&#8221;) but this certainly does not mean that the system is not flexible to fit the profile of the team.  A good Head Coach will take advantage of the available talent and get the victory.  If Paul believes that he can do this at GT without throwing the ball, I&#8217;m not going to argue with him.  Otherwise, if Paul sees good things happening when the ball is in the air, I am confident that he will not neglect to pass the ball.  It is simple as that.</p>
<p>Personally, I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if the Yellow Jackets came out in the first game and pass the ball often to give those sports columnists something to write about for Friday.  On that same note, I also wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if Tech never threw the ball in the first game and keep it on the ground 100% to give future opponents a false sense of security by letting them think that they will only have to worry about defending the ground game.</p>
<p>Either way, as you may be able to tell, I am very excited about this season.  I had very high expectations last year and was let down pretty hard.  I think we will have some surprising wins this year and also unexpected losses but I will be a happy fan just to see the critics proven wrong whether it be this season or the next.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>External Links</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://espn.go.com/blog/acc/post/_/id/2284/georgia-tech-s-johnson-explains-spread-option-offense" target="_blank">Georgia Tech&#8217;s Johnson explains spread-option offense</a></li>
<li><a href="http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/writers/andy_staples/09/09/georgia-tech/index.html" target="_blank">Johnson, Ga. Tech proving option can dominate at highest level</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johnhwang.net/200808/option-based-spread-offense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.744 seconds -->

